Know what Automated Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing is and how it is done?
| Automated Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing |
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing employing an
antimicrobial susceptibility testing system, which offers versatile, customised
testing options to fit laboratories of all sizes, is widely used to generate
minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results. Antimicrobial susceptibility
testing (AST) monitors the inhibition zone of antibiotics and the emergence of
resistant bacteria in sick people to ensure that appropriate antibiotics are
provided. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing can be used to collect
information on local patterns of antimicrobial susceptibility so that therapy
policies can be based on current data on local resistance trends or the
institutional antibiogram.
The creation of an Automated
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing includes electronic instruments such as a plate reader, a video
capture board, and software that measure and interpret susceptibility results
from the inhibitory zone around the antimicrobial disc automatically. Picture
processing principles such as image smoothening, edge boosting, edge detection,
and area detection are used in the measuring and interpretation procedures.
Despite its independent mode, this system is meant to work in tandem with the
widely used MLAB system (Thai antimicrobial susceptibility test software) by
importing patient data and sensitivity criteria from MLAB and afterwards
exporting the interpretation of susceptibility results to MLAB.
During the projection period, an increase in the number of
multidrug resistance cases in tuberculosis (TB), malaria, HIV, influenza, and
other diseases among the worldwide population is likely to lead to a greater
adoption of antimicrobial susceptibility testing to limit resistance exposure.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), around 480,000 new cases of
multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), a type of tuberculosis resistant to
the two most effective anti-TB medications, were diagnosed in 2014. Only about
123,000 instances were found and reported among them.
The system's automatic measurement of the inhibition zone of
1526 antimicrobial discs shows a good correlation (r = 0.97) with expert manual
interpretation. The inhibitory zone assessed by these two techniques differs by
only a few millimetres (The differences of inhibition zone are less than 3
millimetres in 94.1 percent of samples). The automatically generated
interpretation shows a 0.5 percent false-susceptible and 0.2 percent
false-resistant percentage.
Stringent rules and regulations from regulatory agencies are
among the obstacles to the automated
antimicrobial susceptibility testing market's growth. In the European Union, for example, antimicrobial
susceptibility testing (AST) systems are governed by Directive 98/79/EC (IVD
directive), which was replaced in 2017 by Regulation 2017/746 of the European
Parliament and Council. It necessitates the use of an ISO 13485-compliant quality
system for design, development, and manufacture.
Comments
Post a Comment